State of the Science (SOS) Workshop:

Hosted by RIC & UCSD

Functional Restoration for the Stroke Survivor:

Informing the Efforts of Engineers

March 7&8, 2006

Sea Lodge Hotel

La Jolla, CA

 

QUESTIONS FOR SESSIONS

Last updated 2/15/2006 10:20 AM

 

Session 1                                                                

Moderator – Bruce Dobkin, MD, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)

 

Physiology/Pathophysiology of Neural Plasticity

Discussion Leader: Jeffery Kleim, PhD, University of Florida Department of Neurosciences

Respondents:

  • Lumy Sawaki, MD PhD, Wake Forest
  • Nicho Hatsopoulos PhD, University of Chicago

 

Suggested Questions/Themes:

           

1)     What is the relation between structural and functional change in cortex following novel environmental exposure?

 

2)     Does there need to be structural change for permanent functional change to occur?

 

3)     What is the time course of changes in cortical function vs. structural change?

 

4)     Do we know what biological processes underlie these changes?  Do changes in synaptic function precede overt structural changes in cortex?

 

5)     What mechanisms underlie changes in cortical maps in normal animals?

 

6)     Do similar mechanisms apply in pathological states, like stroke?

 

7)     Are certain areas of the nervous system more likely to show plasticity?

 

8)     What is the relationship between motor learning, motor adaptation, and plasticity?

 

 


Session 2                                                                

Moderator - Sandro Mussa-Ivaldi, PhD, Northwestern University and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

 

Motor Learning

Discussion Leader: Dave Reinkensmeyer, PhD, University of California-Irvine

Respondents:

  • Bob Scheidt, PhD, Marquette University
  • Kurt Thoroughman, PhD, Washington University in St. Louis

 

Suggested Questions/Themes:

 

1)     Terminology: What do we mean by the terms motor learning, plasticity and adaptation?

 

2)     Are certain brain sites preferentially engaged in motor learning?  Do lesions in such areas adversely affect learning?

 

3)     How do we distinguish learning from other sources of behavioral change?

 

4)     What synaptic or structural processes underlie motor learning?

 

5)     Do different sensory systems such as vision or proprioception play different roles in learning?

 

6)     What are the external signals that provoke motor learning, and can we influence these signals with robotic devices?

 

7)     Are studies of short-term motor adaptation relevant to motor recovery following stroke?

 

8)     What limits motor recovery following stroke? 

 

9)     How can we use models of motor learning to develop optimal robotic training strategies?  What information do we need to include in those models?

 

 


Session 3                                                                

Moderator: Jim Patton (RIC/NU)

 

Upper Extremity Rehabilitation

Discussion Leader: Mindy Levin, PT, PhD, Physical Therapy Program, McGill University

Respondents:

  • Michelle Johnson, PhD,  (Marquette) – Confirmed
  • Jiping He, PhD, Arizona State University – Confirmed

 

Suggested Questions/Themes:

 

1)     What is meant by robotic therapy?

 

2)     What are the goals of robotic therapy? Are they different from standard therapeutic goals?

 

3)     What is the evidence for effectiveness of robotic therapy on movement recovery and functional recovery? What constitutes effectiveness?

 

4)     What is the most effective application approach studied to date? What type of loads should be used? Elastic, viscous, inertial or combination? What type of controller should be used - impedance based (resistive) or cooperative (guided – assistive)?

 

5)     Is effectiveness related to recovery level? If so, what are the goals for early/late therapy and severe/moderate/mild recovery?

 

6)     What determines what type of therapy may benefit which patients?

 

7)     What theoretical or device system needs to be developed to meet the needs of rehabilitation?

           

 


Session 4                                                                

Moderator –Richard Harvey, MD (RIC)

 

Neuroimaging/Brain Imaging

Discussion Leader: Steve Cramer, MD, University of California-Irvine

Respondents:

  • Steve Small, MD, PhD University of Chicago – Confirmed
  • Bruce Dobkin, MD (UCLA) – Tentatively Confirmed

 

Suggested Questions/Themes:

 

1)     What is the time course of cortical reorganization as evidenced by FMRi following application of environmental changes?

 

2)     How are structural and physiological changes in cortex correlated with different imaging techniques?

 

3)     What is the relationship between neurophysiological changes in the motor system, as detected by TMS, and recovery of function?

 

4)     Can any of the functional imaging methods, with or without lesion data or clinical measures, help us predict who will respond best to an intervention such as a robotic therapy

 

5)     Technical issues – can Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) methods help us identify critical pathway damage in stroke?

 

6)     How does the level of physical effort while performing skilled tasks affect cortical imaging in fMRI?

 

7)     Can the pattern of cortical changes predict functional outcome?

 

8)     What role might the supplementary motor area play in motor relearning after stroke?

 

9)     Can diffusion and perfusion weighted imaging help guide neurological care and rehabilitation approaches after stroke?

 

 


Session 5                                                                

Moderator: Samuel R. Ward, PT, PhD,  UCSD

Introductory Comments (Sam Ward, PT, PhD)-15 min   

 

Clinically Relevant Alterations in Skeletal Muscle

Discussion Leader: Rick Lieber, PhD, UC San Diego

Respondents:

  • Kenneth Baldwin, PhD, UC-Irvine
  • Vince Caiozzo, PhD, UC-Irvine

 

Suggested Questions/Themes:

 

1)     What are some of the most significant structural and/or functional changes that occur in muscle secondary to altered use?

 

2)     What are the most common measures of muscle adaptation? What are the most useful measures of muscle adaptation?

 

3)     What is the evidence for or against the statement that “all muscles adapt equally?”

 

4)     Is serial sarcomere adaptation subject to the same “rules” as parallel adaptation?

 

5)     What “signal” to muscles transduce when they adapt? (stress, strain, calcium, etc.)

 

6)     What types of clinical treatments can actually affect muscles?

 

7)     What changes occur in muscle compared to connective tissue?

 

8)     To what extent does neural and/or mechanical input affect muscle condition?

 

 


Session 6                                                                            

Moderator – David Reinkensmeyer, PhD (UC - Irvine)

 

Lower Extremity Rehabilitation

Discussion Leader: Susan Harkema, PhD, Neurological Surgery, University of

Louisville

Respondents:

  • Steve Kautz, PhD, VA and the University of Florida Gainesville – Confirmed
  • George Hornby, PT, PhD, (UIC/RIC) –Confirmed

 

Suggested Questions/Themes:

 

1)     Can robots be used to restore pattern generator function in SCI? What about stroke? Is the pattern generator altered in stroke?

 

2)     What control approaches are likely to be best? Position, impedance, or cooperative control strategies?

·        Should robots be used as position control devices early in recovery?

·        Should they be switched to force based controllers as recovery proceeds?

·        How do we determine the transition point between control strategies?

 

3)     What do we do about restoration of axial muscle control, and of balance and posture?

 

4)     What are there key differences between lower extremity rehabilitation and upper extremity rehabilitation?

 

5)     How can we use animal models of gait training to assist in optimizing strategies for humans?

 

6)     What limits recovery of gait following stroke?

 

7)     How important is over ground locomotor training vs. locomotor training on a treadmill?

 

8)     What hard evidence is there that the way manual or robotic assistance is applied to a patient affects their recovery?

 

·       Return to the SOS Menu

·       Return to MARS-RERC Home Page